Copy the content of this entry and paste it to your word processor app or software

Peer Evaluation Rubrics

Answer the rubrics per each team, then sum the points.

Number of the team:

Team members:

Subject:

Date:

Rubric starts here:

• Timing

1. The team finishes on time both the activity and the presentation.
2. The team takes too long to finish the presentation or the activity (or both)
3. The team falls short on finishing the presentation or the activity.
4. Team members didn’t plan their time and you can tell by their lack of organization and time measurement between the presentation or the activity,

-Knowledge

1. The team shows more than enough knowledge about the subject and manages to transmit it to the audience.
2. The team has enough knowledge about the subject but fails in answer some questions or some members lack of knowledge about the subject they are presenting.
3. The team falls short regarding knowledge about the subject, but they have a basic idea about the main ideas.
4. The team lacks of general knowledge about key concepts and basic ideas about the subject.

-Intonation 

1. Team members speak with fluency and confidence, besides having a good voice volume.
2. Team members have an ok volume on their voices in general, but sometimes they lower the volume when they are not feeling confident.
3. Team members manage to speak but the audience need to concentrate and listen closely to know what they are saying.
4. Team members lack of volume and is hard to understand what they are saying, even when concentrating on their presentation.

-Coherence

1. There’s an optimal coherence between the presentation, the activity and the performance of the team members.
2. There’s a sufficient coherence between the presentation, the activity and the performance of the team members.
3. There are some problems regarding coherence between the presentation, the activity and the performance of the team members.
4. There’s no coherence between the presentation, the activity and the performance of the team members.

-Dressing and performance

1. Team members dressed and acted like they were professionals and had an optimal performance.
2. Team members dressed and acted like they were professionals and had a sufficient performance. 
3. Team members acted like they were professionals and had a good performance but they didn’t dress up for the activity.
4. Team members’ performance lacked of quality and seriousness,

———————————————

-Underline the features of the Slide presentation:

Right amount of words (text is not saturated).

Right amount of visuals (how they are employed).

Right color combination (Harmony and balance)

Right use of English (Grammar, syntax, spelling)

-Underline the features for the teams’ activity:

Right Engagement

Right Design

It has vision

Right use of English (Grammar, syntax, spelling)

Answer the following:

1. Strong areas:

2. Areas of opportunity:

3. Write your three questions here:

Sum the points

Multiple choice: 

a)= 30 pts

b)= 20 pts

c)= 10 pts

d)= 0 pts

Underline the answers:

Each answer underlined = 5 pts

Total sum:

Would you give the team an amount of extra 10 points for their effort? Y/N (You don’t have to explain why).